• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Mineral solid composition of heavy metals, in particular mercury, present in the flue gases, the process for preparing such a solid mineral compound and its use for the abatement of heavy metals, in particular mercury, present in the flue gases by contacting the flue gases with the solid mineral composition.
    公开号:BE1019419A5
    申请号:E2010/0432
    申请日:2010-07-13
    公开日:2012-07-03
    发明作者:Alain Brasseur；Jean-Paul Pirard；Alain Laudet
    申请人:Lhoist Rech & Dev Sa；Univ Liege；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    "MINERAL SOLID COMPOSITION, ITS PREPARATION METHOD AND ITS USE IN ABATEMENT OF
    HEAVY METALS FROM SMOKE GAS "
    The present invention relates to a composition for reducing heavy metals in flue gases, comprising a mineral compound.
    Heavy metals, in particular mercury, are toxic compounds present in flue gas, especially in the gaseous state, the emission of which is in general strictly regulated. The term "heavy metals" refers mainly to metals with a density greater than 5000 kg / m3, particularly the most common heavy metals, which are generally regulated, namely lead, chromium, copper, manganese, antimony, arsenic, cobalt, nickel, vanadium, cadmium, thallium and mercury, preferably lead, thallium, cadmium and mercury, in particular mercury . These metals can be in the elemental state or in ionic form.
    The reduction of heavy metals present in the flue gases is in the state of the art generally operated by means of carbon compounds, such as activated carbons, lignite cokes or the like. The choice of the types of carbon compounds depends in particular on the regulatory values not to be exceeded for these types of pollutants.
    In many situations, particularly in the case of waste incineration plants, the initial emissions of certain heavy metals are higher, sometimes largely, than the regulations in force, so that it is essential to reduce, sometimes considerably, these pollutants. A carbon compound can be used either as such, or in admixture with a basic reagent, in a fixed bed in granular form or by injection into the gas in powder form; the solid particles are then trapped downstream, for example in a textile filter, where their action is prolonged.
    The effectiveness of carbon compounds in cutting down heavy metals is unanimously recognized. However, the use of these carbon compounds in the flue gases has two major drawbacks: - the increase in the total organic carbon content in the dust present in the discharge of these fumes, carbon content which is severely regulated; - the risk of flammability, all the more important as the temperature of the gases to be purified is high.
    An improvement made by those skilled in the art to solve the ignition problems of carbon compounds has been to use them mixed with non-flammable substances, such as lime. Unfortunately, this improvement did reduce the risk of ignition of carbon compounds but did not completely eliminate them. Indeed, hot spots can still appear, even at low temperature (for example 150 ° C), especially in the presence of air infiltration in areas where the carbon compounds are subject to accumulation.
    For example, US6582497 discloses a mixture of alkaline compound, coal and coal impregnated with a halogenated compound for the reduction of mercury in the flue gas. However, this document does not give any information on the possible doping of mineral compounds and their effect on the abstention of mercury from flue gas.
    Document US 2008/028932 discloses the use of oxidants, preferably calcium hypochlorite, to improve the mercury reduction of gas streams. Calcium hypochlorite is added upstream of the adsorbent injection and reacts with it. However, it is known that calcium hypochlorite is a corrosive, oxidizing and environmentally hazardous compound, which makes its use problematic.
    Finally, the document WO 2007/053786 describes the use of chloride or other oxidants, added with the coal before combustion, which causes the oxidation of mercury to a salt and facilitates its subsequent capture.
    The carbon compounds are generally expensive compounds and the step using said carbon compounds is difficult to integrate into a complete flue gas treatment process, which must often also eliminate nitrogen pollutants. The removal of catalytic nitrogen oxides is generally carried out at a gas temperature above 200 ° C, at which carbon compounds can burn in the presence of oxygen. For good compatibility with a process step using the carbon compounds, it is necessary to alternate cooling of the flue gas and heating thereof. This represents a significant energy loss and an additional cost. It is therefore difficult to integrate the carbon compounds in a flue gas treatment process, given the ignition problems that these compounds cause.
    The documents "ES 8704428" or "ES 2136496", and "GIL, ISABEL GUIJARRO; ECHEVERRIA, SAGRAR IO MENDIOROZ; MARTIN-LAZARO, PEDRO JUAN BERMEJO; ANDRES, VICENTA MUNOZ, Mercury removal from gaseous streams.Effects of adsorbent geometry, Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas and Naturales (Espana) (1996), 90 (3), pp. 197-204 "mention that it is possible to get rid of carbon for the reduction of heavy metals, in particular mercury, by the use of sulfur as reagent. Sulfur is deposited on a mineral support, such as natural silicates. Such formulations thus overcome the aforementioned drawbacks of the carbon compounds. In this case, the silicate is considered as an inert support with respect to the pollutant to be slaughtered; the latter is trapped by reaction with the sulfur compound to form in general a sulphide.
    Unfortunately, silicates functionalized with sulfur compounds are the subject of a dangerous, heavy and expensive manufacture which penalizes its use. For example, the document ES 8704428 discloses a sulfurization of a silicate by a hydrogen sulphide oxidation reaction at a well-defined molar proportion for the purpose of adsorbing elemental sulfur on said silicate. The handling of hydrogen sulfide, highly toxic and extremely flammable, is dangerous and the strict molar proportion necessary to avoid any subsequent oxidation reaction is very restrictive. The document "ES 2136496" provides a similar teaching, describing a process for the sulfidation of natural silicates to retain metal vapors.
    Another example is described in document US 2007/0267343 which provides for the capture of heavy metal particles in aqueous phase in the presence of a complexing compound, preferably phosphorus and in particular a phosphate. In this way, a complex is formed between the phosphate and the metal to be captured in the aqueous phase which has a low solubility and decreases the release of the metal in natural or induced leaching processes, and / or in the digestion processes in the humans or animals. The aqueous phase in which the complexation reaction occurs is therefore essential and this method seems only difficult to apply to the mass abatement of mercury in flue gas with a powdery compound.
    EP 1732668 B1 provides for the use of nonfunctionalized inorganic compounds, especially halloysite for the reduction of metals luuius, in paiuuunei meiuuie. uepenucim, icmoauic uc halloysite for mercury abatement appears limited, in comparison with some activated carbons, leading a priori overdose. In addition, the reduction of heavy metals by non-functionalized mineral compounds, such as halloysite is carried out by adsorption (exothermic), so with an efficiency that decreases when the temperature increases.
    The object of the invention is to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art, by providing a composition as mentioned at the beginning, which is solid, in which said mineral compound is doped, that is to say whose surface is accessible to said flue gas is partially or completely covered by said halide salt, a halide salt and is selected from the group consisting of halloysite, calcium or magnesium carbonates or hydroxides and sodium carbonates and their mixtures and derivatives.
    Indeed, it has been observed very unexpectedly and unpredictably that this mineral compound doped with a halide in the form of salt allows a very effective reduction in a wide temperature range of heavy metals, especially in the gaseous state, present in the flue gases, using a solid mineral compound, whose manufacture and implementation are simple and non-hazardous.
    The effect of this composition according to the invention on the rate of reduction of heavy metals is particularly unexpected because the abatement performance of the doped mineral compound are incommensurate with those of the undoped mineral compound. Thus certain solid mineral materials, which do not have a significant capacity for reducing heavy metals in the undoped state and in particular that do not have significant porosity, such as for example slaked lime, have after doping with a salt of halide according to the invention, heavy metals abatement capacity which can be much higher than many carbon compounds, yet deemed the most suitable for the reduction of heavy metals. Moreover, solid mineral materials already having a propensity for the reduction of heavy metals, in particular mercury such as halloysite, may have their abatement capacity increased tenfold, after doping with a halide salt according to the invention. .
    The inorganic compound according to the invention therefore comprises a mineral carrier, in particular without any known capacity for reducing heavy metals, combined with a halide dopant in the form of salt.
    The mineral compound according to the invention can therefore be slaked lime, dolomite, limestone and / or halloysite, for example.
    By "halide salt-doped mineral compound" is meant a mineral compound selected from the group consisting of halloysite, calcium or magnesium carbonates or hydroxides and sodium carbonates and mixtures and derivatives thereof, of which the surface accessible to the flue gas is partially or completely covered by a halide salt.
    The gas accessible surface comprises not only the outer surface of the constituent particles of the inorganic solid but also a part or the whole of the inner surface of these particles, partially porous.
    In an advantageous embodiment, said halide salt is an inorganic halide salt, so as not to introduce additional carbonaceous compounds into the flue gases.
    The inorganic compound doped with a halide salt contains, on a dry basis, from 0.5% to 20%, preferably from 1% to 15%, in particular from 1.5% to 10% by weight of sodium salt. halide based on the weight of the composition according to the invention. The halide salt may be an alkaline or alkaline earth metal halide, especially NaCl, NaBr or NaI, KCl, KBr or Kl, CaCl 2, CaBr 2 or Cal 2, MgCl 2, MgBr 2 or Mgl 2, or also NH 4 Cl, NH 4 Br or NH 4 or one of their mixtures.
    MVdiiidyt Ubt3iit Iii, it; In the powder form, the particle size is substantially greater than 1 μm and in majority (greater than 90%) less than 1 mm, ie they have a lower d -1% at 1 mm.
    By dgo is meant the interpolated value of the particle size distribution curve, such that 90% of the particles have a dimension smaller than said value.
    Unexpectedly, it has been possible to demonstrate that these inorganic compounds thus doped with a halide salt make it possible to remove with very great efficiency heavy metals, especially in the gaseous state, in particular mercury and especially the metallic mercury Hg °, in the flue gases.
    Other embodiments of the product according to the invention are indicated in the appended claims.
    The present invention also relates to a process for preparing a mineral solid composition according to the invention. This process comprises the steps of: feeding a mineral compound selected from the group consisting of halloysite and calcium or magnesium carbonates or hydroxides and sodium carbonates and mixtures thereof, feeding a salt of halide, and - contacting said inorganic compound and said halide salt with formation of a halide salt-doped mineral compound.
    Advantageously, said contacting of said mineral compound and said halide salt is carried out with stirring.
    As previously mentioned, preferably, in the process according to the invention, the mineral solid material is chosen from the group consisting of slaked lime, dolomite, limestone and / or halloysite.
    Preferably, said fed mineral compound has a humidity of between 0.1 and 100 g / kg, advantageously between 2 and 90 g / kg.
    Advantageously, said contacting is carried out at ambient temperature.
    In a preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, said halide salt is in liquid form, in aqueous phase.
    In addition, said step of bringing said mineral compound into contact with said halide salt is advantageously a spraying of said halide salt on said mineral compound, optionally in the presence of stirring.
    In an alternative preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, said step of bringing said mineral compound into contact with said halide salt is a dipping in one or more steps, optionally with stirring and optionally with intermediate drying steps, of said inorganic compound in said liquid phase halide salt.
    Preferably, said halide salt in the liquid phase is an aqueous solution having a halide salt content of between 1% and the salt saturation of the solution, in particular between 1% and 35%, in particular between 5% and 27%, preferably between 10% and 27% by weight relative to the total weight of said solution. It should be noted that a low concentration of salt in the solution leads to a more difficult implementation of the mixture as well as subsequent drying more expensive. Moreover, the concentration of the solution is limited by the solubility of the salt. The halide salt and the mineral compound are brought into contact so as to promote the most homogeneous distribution possible of the halide salt on the external but also the accessible internal surface of the mineral compound.
    Advantageously, the process according to the invention further comprises a step of drying and / or deagglomeration of said halide salt-doped mineral compound, preferably according to operating conditions (ambient temperature, residence time, etc.) such that the doped mineral compound reaches a temperature between 60 and 200 ° C, in particular between 75 and 170 ° C, in order to reach a residual moisture preferably less than 100g / kg, preferably less than 50 g / kg.
    As mentioned above, preferably, in the process according to the invention, said halide salt is an alkaline halide, an alkaline earth halide or the like, preferably selected from the group consisting of NaCl, NaBr, NaI, KCl, KBr. , K1, CaCl2, CaBr2, Cal2, MgCl2, MgBr2, Mg12, NH4Cl, NH4Br or NH4I or mixtures thereof.
    Other embodiments of the process according to the invention are indicated in the appended claims.
    The present invention also relates to a use of a mineral compound as described above, for the reduction of heavy metals, in particular in the gaseous state, in particular of mercury and especially of metallic mercury Hg °, present in the flue gases, by contacting the flue gases with the abovementioned mineral solid composition and using a mixture of basic reagent and said mineral solid composition for the treatment of the flue gases.
    The doped mineral compound according to the invention is therefore brought into contact with the flue gas to be treated, either as such or in combination with another solid material, in particular in a mixture with a basic agent commonly used for the abatement of gases. fumes acids, such as lime or the like.
    Therefore, the implementation of the mineral solid composition according to the invention requires only obtaining a simple product of use, preferably dry.
    The use of the doped mineral compound according to the invention for the reduction of heavy metals thus comprises contacting said doped mineral compound, preferably in the dry state, carried out at a temperature in the range from 70 to 350 ° C, especially between 110 and 300 ° C and particularly preferably between 120 and 250 ° C. The possibility of operating at temperatures close to or above 200 ° C., inter alia for contacting, makes it possible to maintain a relatively constant temperature throughout the flue gas treatment process and to avoid or limit the consecutive cooling and heating stages for the removal of heavy metals and then the nitrogen compounds by catalysis.
    Advantageously, the inorganic compound according to the invention is used in pulverulent form, namely that the size of the particles is predominantly (more than 90%) less than 1 mm (d90 <1 mm) and substantially greater than 1 μm. The mineral compound is then injected pneumatically into the gas vein.
    The use of the doped mineral compound according to the invention for the reduction of heavy metals in the flue gas is often to be integrated into a complete flue gas treatment. Such a treatment comprises a step of eliminating major acid pollutants by contacting said flue gases with basic reagents. In general, the main acid pollutants in the flue gases include hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, sulfur oxides or nitrogen oxides, their emission levels in the flue gases before treatment are order of several tens to several hundred mg / Nm3.
    When the use of the doped mineral compound according to the invention for the reduction of heavy metals in the flue gas is integrated into a complete treatment of flue gases, basic reagents, for example lime, and said doped mineral compound are implemented separately or in a mixture. This last case allows a saving of investment and space, since since then two stages can be realized simultaneously and in the same place.
    Other uses according to the invention are mentioned in the appended claims.
    Other features, details and advantages of the invention will emerge from the description given below, without limitation and with reference to examples.
    The invention will now be described in more detail by way of non-limiting examples.
    Examples 1 to 9 and the comparative example are laboratory scale tests according to the following experimental procedure. About 100 mg of inorganic compound doped with a halide salt (examples 1 to 9 according to the invention) or undoped (comparative example) are placed in the center of a cylindrical reactor 110 mm long and 10 mm in diameter. inside, so as to form a homogeneous bed on rock wool. A stream of nitrogen containing 600 μg / Nm3 of metallic mercury (Hg °), with a total flow rate of 2.8 10 6 Nm 3 / s passes through this bed. A VM-3000 detector from Mercury Instruments is used to measure the metal mercury content at the reactor outlet. Prior to arrival at the detector, the gas passes through a solution of SnCl2, so as to convert the mercury present in ionic form to metallic mercury. In this way, all the mercury is measured. This device makes it possible to evaluate the abatement capacity of mercury by a solid by applying the principle of the breakthrough curve. The abatement capacity is expressed in (μg Hg) / g of solid. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the methods of preparation and mercury abatement performance for Examples 1 to 7 and the comparative example.
    Comparative example
    Commercially available halloysite or lime is placed in the reactor described above. A breakthrough curve is made at a fixed temperature of 130 ° C. The mercury abatement capacity of this halloysite and this conventional lime, undoped in the previously described device is 40 (pg Hg) / g halloysite and 1 (pg Hg) / g lime, respectively.
    Example 1
    According to the invention, the soaking of a halloysite and a lime similar to those of the comparative example is carried out. This soaking is carried out by respectively immersing halloysite and lime in an aqueous solution with a content of 10% by weight of KBr relative to the weight of the aqueous solution. The wet halloysite and the wet lime thus doped are dried and deagglomerated, at a temperature of 75 ° C in an oven, so as to reach a residual moisture of less than 50 g / kg. The amount of KBr deposited on the halloysite and on the lime after drying is 10% by weight relative to the weight of the composition obtained according to the invention. The mercury removal capacity of this halloysite and this lime doped with KBr according to the invention in the device previously described and operating under the same operating conditions as in the comparative example, is 486 (pg Hg) / g of halloysite doped and 24 (μg Hg) / g of doped lime.
    Table 1 - Synthesis of Laboratory Tests - Lime
    Example 2
    According to the invention, a spraying of a halloysite similar to that of the comparative example is carried out. Spraying is carried out from an aqueous solution with a content of 27% by weight of KBr relative to the weight of the aqueous solution. The solution is sprayed on the halloysite with mechanical stirring, until a humidity of 20% is obtained. The wet halloysite thus doped is dried and deagglomerated, at a temperature of 150 ° C in an oven, so as to reach a residual moisture of less than 50 g / kg. The amount of KBr deposited on the halloysite after drying is 6% expressed by weight relative to the weight of the composition. The mercury reduction capacity of this KBr-doped halloysite is equal to 198 (μg Hg) / g of doped halloysite.
    Example 3 Example 2 is reproduced but with a 27% by weight solution of MgCl 2 based on the weight of the aqueous solution. The solution is sprayed on the halloysite with mechanical stirring, until a humidity of 15% is obtained. The amount of MgCl 2 deposited on the halloysite after drying is 6%, expressed by weight relative to the weight of the composition. The measured mercury abatement capacity is equal to 326 (μg Hg) / g of doped halloysite.
    EXAMPLE 4 Example 2 is reproduced but with a solution containing 27% by weight of MgBr 2 relative to the weight of the aqueous solution. The solution is sprayed on the halloysite with mechanical stirring, until a humidity of 15% is obtained. The amount of MgBr 2 deposited on the halloysite after drying is 6% expressed by weight relative to the weight of the composition. The measured mercury abatement capacity is equal to 3140 (μg Hg) / g of doped halloysite.
    EXAMPLE 5 Example 2 is reproduced but with a 27% by weight solution of CaCl 2 based on the weight of the aqueous solution. The solution is sprayed on the halloysite with mechanical stirring, until a humidity of 17% is obtained. The amount of CaCl 2 deposited on the halloysite after drying is 6% expressed by weight relative to the weight of the composition. The measured mercury abatement capacity is equal to 215 (μg Hg) / g of doped halloysite.
    Example 6 Example 2 is reproduced but with 27% by weight CaBr 2 solution based on the weight of the aqueous solution. The solution is sprayed on the halloysite with mechanical stirring, until a humidity of 15% is obtained. The amount of CaBr 2 deposited on the halloysite after drying is 6% expressed by weight relative to the weight of the composition. The measured mercury abatement capacity is equal to 447 (μg Hg) / g of doped halloysite.
    EXAMPLE 7 Example 2 is reproduced but with a solution containing 9% by weight of NH 4 based on the weight of the aqueous solution. The solution is sprayed on the halloysite with mechanical stirring, until a humidity of 16% is obtained. The amount of NH4I deposited on the halloysite after drying is 2% expressed by weight relative to the weight of the composition. The measured mercury abatement capacity is equal to 1940 (pg Hg) / g of doped halloysite.
    Table 2 - Synthesis of Laboratory Tests - Halloysite
    Example 8 Effect of the Concentration of the Dopant Solution
    Example 2 is repeated by impregnating 4 samples of halloysite similar to that of the comparative example by spraying with solutions of MgBr 2 with a concentration of 5%, 9%, 27% and 35% respectively in order to obtain a content of additive deposited of, respectively, 1%, 2%, 6% and 10%. The impregnated halloysite is placed in a reactor maintained at a fixed temperature of 130 ° C. The mercury abatement capacity is respectively 509, 905, 3140, 3980 (pg Hg) / g halloysite under the conditions of the test. There is therefore a significant increase in the mercury reduction for an increasing halide concentration of the doped halloysite.
    EXAMPLE 9 Influence of the Reactor Temperature Example 2 is reproduced but with a solution containing 27% by weight of CaBr 2 relative to the weight of the aqueous solution. The amount of CaBr 2 deposited on the halloysite after drying is 1.2% expressed by weight relative to the weight of the composition. A breakthrough curve is made at fixed temperatures of 130 ° C, 200 ° C, 250 ° C and 300 ° C. The mercury reduction capacity measured is respectively 367, 829, 926 and 848 (μg Hg) / g of halloysite doped under the conditions of the test. These results demonstrate the advantageous use of the doped compositions according to the invention, especially between 200 ° C. and 300 ° C.
    EXAMPLE 10 Industrial Scale According to the invention, halloysite similar to that of the comparative example is doped by spraying in an industrial mixer. For this purpose, an aqueous solution is sprayed with a content of 25% by weight of KBr relative to the weight of the aqueous solution. The rate of halloysite doped, wet at 18%, is 200 kg / h. The latter is deagglomerated and dried in a cage mill (cage mill), using hot gases at about 400-450 ° C and a residence time such that the gases leave the mill / dryer at about 150 ° vs. We obtain a halloysite according to the invention, dried and 10% by weight of KBr weight relative to the weight of the composition.
    The halloysite thus doped is used in a flue gas treatment line having a flow rate of approximately 150 000 Nm3 / h from the recycling of non-ferrous metals. The doped halloysite is dosed by means of a screw and pneumatically injected into the gaseous stream at 170 ° C. at a rate of 60 kg / h, then collected in a bag filter, in particular with the combustion dusts.
    Mercury concentrations upstream of the injection point of the doped halloysite and downstream of the atomic absorption bag filter (MERCEM of Sick-Maihak) were measured. The concentrations measured, normalized on dry gases and reported at 20% oxygen are: - 87 μg / Nm3 upstream and -13 μg / Nm3 downstream. This result shows a mercury abatement rate of 85%.
    Example 11: Industrial scale The doped halloysite of Example 11 is used in a flue gas treatment line having a flow rate of about 20,000 Nm3 / h from the recycling of non-ferrous metals. The doped halloysite is dosed by means of a screw and pneumatically injected into the gas stream at 70 ° C. at a rate of 30 kg / h, then collected in a bag filter, in particular with the combustion dusts.
    The mercury concentrations upstream of the injection point of the doped halloysite and downstream of the bag filter by atomic absorption were measured. The concentrations measured, normalized on dry gas and reported at 21% oxygen are: - 450 pg / Nm3 upstream and - 30 pg / Nm3 downstream. This result is lower than the current regulation of 50 pg / Nm3 and shows a mercury abatement rate of 93%.
    It should be understood that the present invention is in no way limited to the embodiments described above and that many modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
    权利要求:
    Claims (19)
    [1]
    1. Solid composition for reducing heavy metals in flue gas comprising a mineral compound, preferably non-functionalized, doped with a halide salt, that is to say whose surface accessible to flue gas is partially or entirely covered by a halide salt, said mineral compound being selected from the group consisting of halloysite, calcium or magnesium carbonates or hydroxides, and sodium carbonates as well as mixtures thereof.
    [2]
    The composition of claim 1, wherein said halide salt is an inorganic halide salt.
    [3]
    The composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein said mineral compound is preferably selected from the group consisting of halloysite, slaked lime, dolomite and limestone, and mixtures thereof.
    [4]
    The composition according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said halide salt is present in an amount on a dry basis ranging from 0.5% to 20% by weight, preferably from 1% to 15% by weight. weight and in particular from 1.5% to 10% by weight of halide salt based on the weight of the composition.
    [5]
    The composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said halide salt is an alkali halide, an alkaline earth halide or the like, preferably selected from the group consisting of NaCl, NaBr, NaI, KCl, KBr, K1, CaCl2, CaBr2, Cal2, MgCl2, MgBr2, Mg12, NH4Cl, NH4Br or NH4I or mixtures thereof.
    [6]
    6. Composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the inorganic compound is in powder form and has a dgo less than 1 mm and in particular a particle size between 1 pm and 1 mm.
    [7]
    7. A process for preparing a solid composition for the removal of heavy minerals in flue gases comprising the steps of: feeding a mineral compound chosen from the group consisting of halloysite, calcium carbonates or hydroxides or magnesium and sodium carbonates and mixtures thereof, feeding a halide salt, and contacting said inorganic compound and said halide salt with formation of a halide salt-doped mineral compound.
    [8]
    8. The method of claim 7, wherein said contacting said mineral compound and said halide salt is carried out with stirring.
    [9]
    9. The method of claim 7 or claim 8, wherein said fed mineral compound has a moisture of between 0.1 and 100 g / kg, preferably between 2 and 90 g / kg.
    [10]
    The method of any of claims 7 to 9, wherein said contacting is performed at room temperature.
    [11]
    11. The process according to any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein said halide salt is in liquid form, in aqueous phase.
    [12]
    The process according to any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein said step of contacting said inorganic compound with said halide salt is a spraying of said halide salt on said mineral compound.
    [13]
    The method of any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein said contacting step of said mineral compound and said halide salt is a soaking of said mineral compound in said liquid phase halide salt.
    [14]
    The process according to any one of claims 11 to 13, wherein said liquid phase halide salt is an aqueous or non-aqueous solution having a halide salt content of between 1% and the salt saturation of the salt. solution, especially between 1% and 35%, preferably between 5% and 27% by weight relative to the total weight of said solution.
    [15]
    15. Method according to one of claims 7 to 14, further comprising a step of drying and deagglomeration said halide salt-doped mineral compound, preferably at a temperature between 60 and 200 ° C, in particular between 75 and 75 ° C. and 170 ° C.
    [16]
    The process according to any one of claims 7 to 15, wherein said halide salt is an alkaline halide, an alkaline earth halide or the like, preferably selected from the group consisting of NaCl, NaBr, NaI, KCl, KBr, KI, CaCl2, CaBr2, Cal2, MgCl2, MgBr2, Mg12, NH4Cl, NH4Bru NH4I or mixtures thereof.
    [17]
    17. Use of the composition according to any one of claims 1 to 6, for the reduction of heavy metals, preferably in the gaseous state, in particular of mercury and particularly of metal mercury Hg ° in the flue gas .
    [18]
    18. Use according to claim 17 with another solid material, in particular in a mixture with a basic agent such as lime.
    [19]
    19. Use according to claim 17 or 18, wherein said doped mineral compound is brought into contact with the flue gas at a temperature ranging from 70 to 350 ° C, in particular between 110 and 300 ° C and preferably between 120 and 250 ° C.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    BE1019420A5|2012-07-03|MINERAL SOLID COMPOSITION, PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF AND ITS USE IN THE ABATEMENT OF DIOXINS AND HEAVY METALS FROM SMOKE GASES.
    CN107530620B|2021-01-29|Flue gas purification system and method using sorbent polymer composites
    JP5740070B2|2015-06-24|Adsorbent to remove mercury from flue gas
    BE1019419A5|2012-07-03|MINERAL SOLID COMPOSITION, PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF AND USE THEREOF IN HEAVY METAL ABATEMENT OF SMOKE GASES.
    EP2611533A1|2013-07-10|Improved sorbents for removing mercury from emissions produced during fuel combustion
    CA2559567C|2012-07-31|Method for abating mercury in flue gases
    CA2748297C|2017-09-05|Preparation of a solid containing zinc oxide used for purifying a gas or a liquid
    FR3053039A1|2017-12-29|PROCESS FOR PREPARING A FINE AND VERY POROUS PULVERULENTLY CHOPPED LIME COMPOSITION AND PRODUCT OBTAINED THEREFROM
    BE1023752B1|2017-07-11|LIME BASED SORBENT COMPOSITION FOR REMOVAL OF MERCURY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
    BE1021753B1|2016-01-15|HYDRATED LIME COMPOSITION FOR THE TREATMENT OF SMOKE
    FR3053038A1|2017-12-29|HIGHLY POROUS PULVERULENT HEATED LIME COMPOSITION
    WO2009141695A1|2009-11-26|Process for the combustion of coal with use of an absorbent agent in aqueous dispersion, ashes obtained and uses thereof
    RU2574541C2|2016-02-10|Solid mineral composition, method for obtaining and application thereof for reducing content of heavy metals in waste gas
    BE1023799B1|2017-07-26|HIGHLY POROUS PULVERULENTLY CHOPPED LIME COMPOSITION
    BE1025964A1|2019-08-23|SORBENT COMPOSITION FOR AN ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
    MX2012000589A|2012-06-01|Solid mineral composition, method for preparing same and use thereof for reducing heavy metals in flue gas.
    JPH1170315A|1999-03-16|Treatment of high temperature gas
    WO1996007468A1|1996-03-14|Reactive composition and method for the purification of a nitric oxide containing gas
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    RU2012104805A|2013-08-20|
    JP5689878B2|2015-03-25|
    NZ598094A|2013-06-28|
    UA108616C2|2015-05-25|
    PL2454006T3|2016-04-29|
    US20120167762A1|2012-07-05|
    CN102574054A|2012-07-11|
    US8871006B2|2014-10-28|
    MA33459B1|2012-07-03|
    JP2012532753A|2012-12-20|
    EP2454006A1|2012-05-23|
    AU2010272565A1|2012-02-23|
    WO2011006890A1|2011-01-20|
    FR2947736A1|2011-01-14|
    CA2767281A1|2011-01-20|
    FR2947736B1|2015-09-18|
    EP2454006B1|2015-09-02|
    SG177538A1|2012-02-28|
    IL217479D0|2012-02-29|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US6582497B1|2000-06-09|2003-06-24|Merck & Co., Inc.|Adsorption power for removing mercury from high temperature high moisture gas streams|
    US20080028932A1|2001-01-26|2008-02-07|Minplus Holding B.V.; Nieuwegein, Netherlands|Method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream|
    WO2007053786A1|2005-11-05|2007-05-10|Radway Jerrold E|Control of combustion system emissions|
    US20070267343A1|2006-05-17|2007-11-22|Keith Edward Forrester|Heavy metal particulate emission speciation modification wet process|
    US1907076A|1930-08-28|1933-05-02|Texaco Salt Products Company|Hygroscopic salts and their preparation|
    US2276503A|1935-11-06|1942-03-17|Calcium Carbonate Company|Iodized calcium carbonate|
    US3345265A|1963-10-09|1967-10-03|Kendall & Co|Multiple layer tablet with calcium salt central core separated from soluble fluoride outer coating|
    US3576666A|1969-05-05|1971-04-27|Ivan B Cutler|Coated refractory structural members|
    JPS4884727A|1972-02-16|1973-11-10|
    JPS4974195A|1972-11-16|1974-07-17|
    US4094686A|1974-06-07|1978-06-13|Plastiroute S.A.|Road-surface additive for preventing ice and melting snow|
    NL7513232A|1975-11-12|1977-05-16|Seikisui Chemical Co Ltd|PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF STABILIZERS FOR CHLORIC RESINS.|
    JPS56113330A|1980-02-09|1981-09-07|Mitsubishi Metal Corp|Removal of mercury in smelting gas|
    DE3117542A1|1981-05-04|1983-02-10|Franz Josef Gattys Ingenieurbüro für Chem. Maschinen- und Apparatebau, 6078 Neu-Isenburg|METHOD FOR STABILIZING DEHYDRATED MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE AGAINST RUECK HYDRATION|
    ES8704428A1|1986-02-11|1987-04-16|Consejo Superior Investigacion|Mercury vapour adsorbent prodn.|
    KR0184681B1|1995-01-24|1999-05-15|구보타 다다시|Thermal insulating foamed material having carbon dioxide absorbent and method for manufacturing the same|
    ES2136496B1|1996-06-18|2000-10-01|Consejo Superior Investigacion|NATURAL SILICATE SULFURATION PROCEDURE TO RETAIN METAL VAPORS.|
    JP4241693B2|1999-11-26|2009-03-18|メタウォーター株式会社|Combustion exhaust gas treatment method|
    BE1015949A3|2004-03-15|2005-12-06|Lhoist Rech & Dev Sa|Method for reduction of mercury and heavy metal smoke gas.|
    US20060016690A1|2004-07-23|2006-01-26|Ilya Ostrovsky|Method for producing a hard coating with high corrosion resistance on articles made anodizable metals or alloys|
    US7858061B2|2005-12-15|2010-12-28|The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The United States Environmental Protection Agency|Compositions and methods for removing mercury from mercury-containing fluids|
    US8906823B2|2007-09-24|2014-12-09|Basf Corporation|Pollutant emission control sorbents and methods of manufacture and use|
    US8450232B2|2009-01-14|2013-05-28|Lummus Technology Inc.|Catalysts useful for the alkylation of aromatic hydrocarbons|
    US8216535B2|2009-09-28|2012-07-10|Calgon Carbon Corporation|Sorbent formulation for removal of mercury from flue gas|AU2006225140B2|2005-03-17|2012-01-19|Douglas C. Comrie|Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
    PL1872054T3|2005-03-17|2019-07-31|Nox Ii International, Ltd.|Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
    AU2010272573A1|2009-07-13|2012-02-23|S.A. Lhoist Recherche Et Developpement|Solid inorganic composition, method for preparing same, and use thereof for reducing dioxins and heavy metals in flue gases|
    EP3302763A1|2015-06-03|2018-04-11|Solvay SA|Process for treating a gas contaminated by metals or organics compounds using a calcium-phosphate reactant comprising apatite|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    BE200900426|2009-07-13|
    BE200900426|2009-07-13|
    US33225610P| true| 2010-05-07|2010-05-07|
    US33225610|2010-05-07|
    [返回顶部]